logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.02.08 2011가단69739
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 13, 2007, on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), for which the registration of ownership transfer was made under the Plaintiff’s name, the registration of ownership transfer was made under the Defendant’s name on February 1, 2007 (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership transfer”).

B. On July 22, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant and the Daegu Bank in the name of the Defendant for the transfer of the instant ownership in the name of the Defendant and the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the establishment of the Daegu Bank (Tgu District Court 2007Gahap10645). On the ground that the registration of the establishment of the instant ownership was completed by a document forged, the Plaintiff was declared to accept all the Plaintiff’s claims on the grounds that the registration of the establishment of the ownership was invalid by the document forged.

C. Although the Defendant filed an appeal against the foregoing judgment under the Daegu High Court Decision 2010Na6544, the lower judgment was rendered on April 21, 2011, and the final appeal was also rendered on August 18, 2011 (Supreme Court Decision 201Da40854), the lower judgment was also rendered on August 18, 201.

According to the above final judgment, on October 14, 201, the cancellation registration of transfer of ownership in this case was completed.

E. The defendant has occupied and used the real estate of this case until now.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, since the real estate of this case is owned by the plaintiff, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.

arrow