logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.07 2017구합107710
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. On October 20, 1980, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) bank and worked as a bank source, such as C Branch, Ulsan Northern Branch, and Roin Branch, from January 22, 2010 to December 31, 2016. The Intervenor bank is a corporation engaging in financial business with 3,100 full-time employees and 3,100 employees, established on October 7, 1967.

B. On August 2016, the inspector’s division of the Intervenor bank discovered the Plaintiff’s insolvency of loans to D Co., Ltd. handled by the Plaintiff, and conducted an investigation into the entire loan handled by the Plaintiff, and confirmed that the Plaintiff violated the Plaintiff’s standard for pre-payment of loans [i.e., violation of the standard for pre-payment of loans (including relevant non-existence of history), (ii) non-performance of confirmation of loan usage, (iii) non-performance of loan handling, (iv) non-performance of credit rating adjustment work, (v) non-performance of credit guarantee special terms, (vii) gross negligence of non-performance of credit guarantee special terms, 7.2 billion won of loans, 5.6 billion won of loans to the Intervenor (including gross negligence of 3.3.5 billion won of loans) and compensation for the same amount as the Plaintiff’s 11 company and 14.6 billion won of loans, 2.4 million won of disciplinary action, including the Plaintiff’s gross negligence of 2.6 billion won of loans and compensation for the same portion.

B, while reducing 70% of the amount of compensation, 42,516,000 won was decided.

Since then, the intervenor bank shall, at the request of the plaintiff.

arrow