logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.12 2013고합46
상해치사
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On May 21, 2012, the Defendant got out of the cement floor of the cement room outside the above three entrances on the ground that the victim E (53 years of age, 53 years of age) living together with the rest of the house room of D, which was located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and the rest of the defendant.

After that, the Defendant her drinking alcohol, and returned to the above location while drinking alcohol around the same day. However, the Defendant did not open a visit by making the victim fit from the Defendant who frightened the usual drinking. After that, the Defendant opened the door door to the victim so that the victim can not drink, and entered the body part of the victim's right side to drinking once again after drinking twice, the part of the victim's body was frightened by drinking, and the victim's body part was walking back to the other part of the victim's body so that the victim could not know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of each prosecutor's statement concerning D and F in the prosecutor's office;

1. Statement in the police statement of E;

1. Each description of the reply ( female emergency call 1366) , a confirmation of the fact of counseling on damage (ONE-SPOP support center) , a reply to the inquiry of the fact (G hospital NE-SOP surgery and doctor F);

1. Each description of a medical certificate for E prepared by a medical doctor H and a medical opinion for E prepared by a medical doctor I;

1. Descriptions of investigation reports (reports accompanying results of the CT photographing) and the application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts and the assertion of a criminal defendant and his/her defense counsel;

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant dyke the victim and the toilet dyke the victim dyke so that the victim cannot work properly and dyke the house.

After that, the defendant has returned to the house again, and the victim does not open a visit, so there is only the desire for the victim, and there is no reason to see the victim.

2. Determination.

arrow