logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.20 2014노1149
재물손괴
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has no damage to the victim's vehicle;

2. The judgment of the court below and the court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① according to the CCTV screen that recorded the scene of the accident, the defendant naturally salking both arms and walked up until the defendant gets off the underground parking lot through stairs and sees it around the victim's vehicle, while the defendant salpings the left hand on the side of the victim's vehicle without plucking the defendant's left arms toward the victim's vehicle by plucking off the victim's vehicle, and then spicking nature spicking the defendant's left arms toward the victim's vehicle. ② According to the CCTV image screen that the defendant's left hand is deemed to have contacted the victim's vehicle by the CCTV image, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow