logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.20 2013가합69694
손해배상(기)
Text

1.(a)

Defendant B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, M, Q, R, T, U,V, Y, and Z jointly.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties, etc. 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (A from Company C to December 16, 2008) changed the trade name;

Defendant B’s “Defendant B”

AG Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AG”) is a company aimed at multi-level marketing, such as health and food sales business.

The purpose of Defendant D is to visit and sell business, etc. (2) Defendant D was to act as the representative director of Defendant B from May 15, 2003 to October 13, 2008, and after establishing AG on October 30, 2003, the director and the representative director of AG are responsible for the duties of the director of AG and the director of the AG after establishing AG on October 30, 2003. AG’s representative director of AG on July 14, 2005 is the wife of Defendant HD.

In other words, on August 31, 2006, Defendant F was changed to Defendant Y on December 26, 2006, and on May 25, 2006, AH, Defendant F, and Y were practically operated.

3) Defendant B, having six branch offices in Gangnam-gu, Busan, Gwangju, Incheon, Daejeon, and Daegu, had 62 branch offices in the Republic of Korea and operated 57 center thereafter on April 2005 (AG operated through Defendant B’s branch offices and centers, and did not have a separate branch office and center.

A) Defendant B and AG’s business site (Center’s representative) and business site manager (Center’s representative) are the same. The organization relationship between Defendant B and AG’s upper-tier seller (recommended) and assistant multi-stage salesmen (recommended) were maintained as it is, and the organization of Defendant B and AG’s sales clerks was managed in the same computer system until April 2006. Defendant D held inquiries from Defendant B’s head office in the presence of Defendant B and AG employees in the presence of Defendant B and B, and Defendant B and AG employees in the presence of Defendant B and B, upon entering into the business agreement around July 2005, Defendant B and AG in fact managed only electronic and sales, and Defendant B and Defendant B, as executive director in the business management division of Defendant B, as the executive director in the Defendant’s business management division.

arrow