A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2016, the defendant appeared as a witness of the defendant's case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), against the above court 2016 high 6C et al. and 7, which is located in Geum-dong, Geum-dong, Daejeon District Court 108, and tried to testify after being notified of the right to refuse to testify.

1. In relation to the investigation report of 1,808 of the evidence records of the above case among the interrogation of the defense counsel, the defendant is required to report the investigation that the witness stated in the prosecutor's office.

On July 24, 2012, in relation to the meeting minutes of the Council, a witness made a statement to an investigative agency on the following matters:

The question of “the witness, memory, or the summary” is the same as the answer of the wrong answer.

(b) Fact is that there is no discussion about the person who will be in charge of the horse at the end of the Council and in E with the charge of the horse.

(b) It shall not be entrusted to E even in the case of a final council or a working-level council itself;

There was no such a story.

The testimony was made to the effect that there was no discussion about how to bear the responsibility for the person's charge related to the DNA item test and there was no discussion about the burden of the special charge to E at the end of the Council and the working-level meeting of D, etc.

However, in fact D, the method of sharing the shares of the Defendant was discussed through the Religious Council and the working-level deliberation committee, and there was a discussion about preparing the shares of the Defendant to bear the special shares in E, but the Defendant testified as above.

2. In relation to the investigation report on the fourth right of evidence of the instant case 1,808 in the prosecutor’s examination, the Defendant reported how to dice.

I asked "I became aware through the match".

I judge.

“I shall not continue to respond to questions asked for whom a copy of the investigation report has been delivered by anyone,” and “FB prior to the testimony of this case.