Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Since the location of the Defendant is unknown, the Defendant stated that the same part as the relevant evidence is stated in the same manner as “(see, e.g., the page of evidence record).”

Based on evidence, the prosecutor's facts charged are modified to the extent that it does not adversely affect the defendant's right of defense and actually affect the contents of the facts charged, and it does not result in the change of the subject of trial by the court.

On November 23, 2019, at around 21:38 (see, e.g., evidence No. 10 of the record) on the corridor of “C” building in Chuncheon-si B (see, e.g., evidence No. 10), the Defendant requested that “the contact point of the Defendant is known to the Defendant,” from the police officer belonging to the Gangwon Chuncheon Police Station D Zone D District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report that there was an assault.” However, the Defendant did not comply therewith, without complying therewith, “this e.g., e.,” and sent the face of the above E one time with the Defendant’

(See Article 14 of the Evidence Records) Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of 112 Reporting Form 112 and Acts and subordinate statutes to caps;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

A. Although the Defendant committed the instant crime and was released when he was arrested as a flagrant offender, the Defendant did not take measures to ensure that the Defendant’s summons was properly made after the arrival of the police officer on March 19, 2020, after the arrival of the court on March 19, 2020, until the date of the pronouncement of the instant case.

The instant crime was committed against a police officer who received the “Uniform” and thus, it was committed with the investigation of the instant crime by effectively executing the public authority.