1. The Defendant’s disposition of imposing sanctions against the Plaintiff on January 8, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the manufacture and sales business of B system, and C (hereinafter “C”) is a company incorporated for the principal purpose of the installation, maintenance, repair, and sale of B system manufactured by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “C”).

(b) B system tender outline 1) D inspection method 1) The inspection method means the customer who uses D and pays the fee.

(B) check mechanical measuring instruments or digital measuring instruments into the body (hereinafter referred to as “passing personnel inspection method”).

2) Shall install E in the mechanical type measuring instrument of a receptor and install the marbiner F (portable terminal, hereinafter referred to as “F”) in the outdoor connection group.

(B) the automatic inspection is conducted by connecting to the Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “B”).

(3) The method of remote inspection by installing telecommunications mortars and relays on a digital measuring instrument of a prisoner (hereinafter referred to as “radio remote inspection method”).

As of the end of 2010, B systems used in B are composed of D measurement techniques in the form of a camera E installed in the existing measuring instruments, outdoor connectionors and software installed in E used as a vehicle for transmitting data from E to F, with outdoor contactors and software output with 0.3% of the radio remote tracking method. 2) The system used in B consists of D measurement techniques installed in the existing measuring instruments, which are automatically checked by installing a non-electric image photographing method E, and which are installed in the existing measuring instruments in the form of a camera for transmitting data from E to F.

3) As of December 2012, a total of 106,200 gales (referred to as "Peseseses"; hereinafter the same shall apply) shall apply.

Of them, the Plaintiff and C are 103,200, and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).

(C) The Plaintiff and C’s collaborative act 1) and C respectively establish and deliver 3,000 parts. The Plaintiff and C’s collaborative act from August 9, 2007 to March 13, 2013, each local government I (hereinafter “demanding Authority”).