1. As to KRW 20,011,384 and KRW 7,821,312 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 5,298,740 from February 1, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with A and B B (hereinafter, referred to as the Plaintiff’s vehicle), and the Defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C-A-Wed Vehicles (hereinafter, referred to as the Defendant vehicle).

B. On September 27, 2013, around 07:32, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven the front road in front of the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, in the long-term distance protection area of the college building, one-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the road, and the victim’s body part of the victim’s body seated on the right side with a crosswalk without signal lights from the right side to the left side was shocked to the front line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and stopped the emergency, etc. after passing the crosswalk, and making a stop on the first-lane.

C. A taxi that reported the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped the Plaintiff’s vehicle beyond the median line, but the Defendant’s vehicle attempted to overtake the Plaintiff vehicle on a two-lane basis without finding any victim who was placed in the crosswalk, and the victim’s head was shocked.

The victim suffered approximately 6 weeks of credit in the above accident, which requires medical treatment of approximately 6 weeks of credit, cage fages, and approximately 8 weeks of credit in need of medical treatment.

E. From September 27, 2013 to January 31, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 39,106,560, and KRW 26,493,700 from February 1, 2014 to July 11, 2014, and KRW 34,456,66,920 in total, from July 12, 2014 to February 28, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 10, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above recognition of the liability for reimbursement, the instant traffic accident is due to the joint tort committed by the Defendant vehicle, who neglected the duty of care to safely drive after the passage of the crosswalk by checking whether there is a person with a road, and breached the duty of care to safely drive.