logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.25 2015노1501
범인도피교사등
Text

The judgment below

Part concerning each crime of No. 1 of the judgment shall be reversed.

As to each crime listed in Article 1 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendant’s defense counsel presented the statement of facts after the deadline for submitting the statement of reasons for appeal (as of August 11, 2015), in relation to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (As of May 8, 2014), the Defendant’s defense counsel did not conduct business until July 6, 2014, and did not have any legitimate ground for appeal. However, even if the Defendant’s defense counsel raised after the lapse of the deadline for submitting the statement of reasons for appeal, it cannot be seen as having acknowledged this part of the charges in the lower court’s court’s judgment, and the Defendant did not have any error of law regarding the Defendant’s statement of facts regarding the Defendant’s remaining office from 06th to 7th day of July 30, 2014, the Defendant stated that the Defendant’s average number of evidence from 06th day to 36th day of July 2014 (as of May 30, 2014).

misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles - violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

arrow