The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable (one month of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of fraud against the victim C, D, E, and J in the first instance judgment and the second instance judgment No. 2013, the second instance judgment No. 2013, the second instance judgment No. 2013, the second instance judgment No. 7104, and each of the crimes of fraud against the victim G, H, I, and J in the second instance).

2. The fact that the defendant's mistake is divided, the victim K, N,O, P, Q, Q, and M have agreed with it, and the victim C, D, E, E, and E should consider equality with the case of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) for which the judgment of 2011 became final and conclusive in relation to each crime of fraud against the victim C, D, E, and E among the 2013-Ma6035 and 7104 of the judgment of the court below. However, the crime of this case is committed continuously for more than two years, and the crime of this case is committed continuously against multiple victims, and the total amount of the victims' damage is more than 28,8520,000 won, and the damage amount of the victims not agreed is more than 12,1520,000 won, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances after the crime, and all the records and arguments of this case cannot be considered to have been sentenced to a heavy sentencing.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.