logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.15 2016구단760
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 30, 1997, the Plaintiff acquired a Class II ordinary car driving license (B) on August 4, 2007, and Class I ordinary car driving license on July 17, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of driver’s license suspension for 100 days and completed traffic safety education (from August 27, 2015 to October 15, 2015).

B. However, on September 28, 2015, the Plaintiff, while driving a car with Cents during the suspension period of a driver’s license as above, was under control in front of the 487 community credit cooperatives in Ansan-si.

C. On October 15, 2015, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license pursuant to Article 93(1)19 of the Road Traffic Act on the ground that the Plaintiff driven during the suspension period of his/her driver’s license.

The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on December 8, 2015, but was dismissed on January 22, 2016.

[Grounds for recognition] The entry of No. 4 and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s family member’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s husband’s family member had returned to the memorials of the time, and the Plaintiff’s second husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband

B. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the fact that the Plaintiff was driving while the Plaintiff was a driver’s license during the suspension period, and the circumstance alleged by the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have any inevitable circumstance that could not avoid driving without a license at the time. The Plaintiff’s aforementioned circumstances are all required.

arrow