A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2017, at around 00:05, the Defendant brought an dispute with the above C on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol in the Maritime High School located in the Haban-dong, Haban-dong, Busan, on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol in the taxi, around August 9, 2017. At around 00:05, the Defendant was dispatched to the scene upon receipt of a report by 112 by E global guards F, G, Ha, and Ha on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol in the Na

1. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime against F and H around 0:50 on the street in front of the K Singing practice hall located in the Busan Seo-gu, Busan, and the background F and the victim H (34 tax) sought to stop the Defendant who was in a state of interest due to the dispute between the Defendant and F and the victim H (34 tax) in the above C, with the victim’s hand room at one time, the victim’s arms were broken by entering the said F and the victim’s arms were cut up once, and the cement bricks and shoess were laid down to the above F.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the 112 reporting management, and at the same time, the defendant conducted an inspection that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

2. The Defendant: (a) was informed of the date and time, place, and on the grounds stated in paragraph (1) above; (b) was arrested as an offender of the crime obstructing the performance of official duties; and (c) was arrested as an offender of the crime obstructing the performance of official duties; and (d) took the 112 patrols, she was released from the Defendant’s arms and descendants.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. On-site photographs pertaining to interference with the performance of official duties (the defendant and his defense counsel's act of arresting the defendant without any justifiable reason while taking measures for returning home by a police officer H, constitutes illegal arrest, and the defendant's act of assaulting H in the course of resistance to such arrest does not constitute a crime of interference with the performance of official duties as a legitimate defense.

Since it is argued, knife, .