The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (four months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, that it is difficult to see the amount of damage, and that the living penalty is a favorable circumstance to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to the theft of the same law, and re-offendered during the suspended execution period due to the same crime, and that there is a lot of history of criminal punishment is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, when comprehensively considering the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and sentencing criteria, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.