Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project operator who is published on October 23, 2012 by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (I): Defendant;
B. Before the division and expropriation of land, J Forest land 30,01 square meters was divided into J, L, M, N, and O forests due to the instant project.
The divided land owned 2/18 shares of Plaintiff A, B, and C, 6/18 shares of Plaintiff D, 1/18 shares of Plaintiff E, and 1/18 shares of F.
(Foreign K 4/18 shares). (c)
On August 21, 2014, the Central Land Expropriation Committee opened a written adjudication on expropriation on August 21, 2014: 1,021 39,600 L/N21 436,431,600 N1,600 39,600 56,152,800 O 1,6555 39,600 65,600 65,538,000 65,538,000 x 558,122,400 : 62,013,600 won for each of the 62,013,600 won (=58,122,400 x 22/18) or 186,000 won for compensation for losses (i.e., the remaining land) x 3081,205,2085,2810 x 501636,2810
The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation for a stock company and an appraisal corporation for the first day of a stock company (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal for adjudication"): October 14, 2014;
D. The appraiser at the court of first instance (hereinafter “court appraiser”) assessed the land before subdivision by individual parcel and assessed the land before subdivision on the premise that the said land is dead and adjacent to the J land before subdivision. Since Qgu land adjoining to local highways is owned by the Plaintiffs, the amount of compensation was calculated by dividing the said land by the case where the said land is assessed on the premise that the land before subdivision is not dead and the land before subdivision is owned by the Plaintiffs.
1) In the case of deeming that it is a master (i.e., an individual parcel), the sum of 540,223,020,021 L 11,021,330,422,434,930 N 1,418,330,354,351,940O 1,65538,630,330,436,150.