1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this part of the facts is as follows: “The above F land and the above G land are installed with a concrete pole and a steel pole (hereinafter “the steel pole, etc.”) on the ground connected in order to each point of indicated 11 through 20 of the annexed drawings among the above G land, and the part which connects each point of indicated 11 through 18 of the annexed drawings No. 2 of the above land is installed on the ground (hereinafter “the green material net, etc. of this case”).” In addition, the ground for recognition is as follows: “The steel pole and its green material net (hereinafter “the green material net, etc. of this case”) are installed on the ground connected in order to each point of indicated in the annexed drawings No. 5 and 7 of the first instance court, the result of on-site verification by the court of first instance, the result of appraisal by the court of first instance on July 20, 2017 and the result of appraisal by the court of first instance 201.”

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court, that “K and the Plaintiff, among the above F land, occupied and used as part of the above J’s land for the passage to the above H, in order of 11, 3, 4, 14, 13, 12, and 11, the part concerning “bb” and the part concerning “4,” among the above G land, connected with each of the said G land, in sequence of 2, 14, 4, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, and 14, and the part concerning “4,” and the part concerning “4,” among the aforementioned G land, were connected to each of the above J’s land, as part of the said J’s land, and was 13,000 square meters as part of the passage to the above H’s land, and as part of the instant land, 13,000 square meters as part of the instant land, and 14,0001.