logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2015.05.08 2014가단11661
토지소유권확인
Text

1. The 3/11 of the F return of 809, the 3/11, the 2/11, the 2/11, the 2/11, the 3/11, the 2/11, the 3/11, the 4-D, and the 2/11, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 4, 1962, G (H insan-gun on the registry address) with respect to the F Return 809 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Ysan-si, the said G currently owns the instant land.

B. Meanwhile, the name of the husband of the plaintiff A and the father of the other plaintiffs is I, and the death on June 30, 1997.

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). (c)

Since the land of this case was owned by the deceased, the Plaintiffs intended to register inheritance following the death of the deceased, but the inheritance registration was not made on the ground that the identity between G and the deceased, which were recorded as the owner of the land of this case on the registry, is not recognized (the address of G in the registry of register, Y, and no ground exists for the registration of the deceased’s address at this place).

[Ground of recognition] The items of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by Gap evidence Nos. 6, 7-1, 2, 3, and 8-1, 2, 8-2, and 9 of Gap evidence Nos. 6, 7-1, 8-1, 8-2, and 9, namely, the land of this case has been cultivated by J, K, and L for a long time, and the tax imposed on the land of this case has been borne by them (the objectively verified is from 1995 to 2011, K, and 2014). ② The J is a relative between the deceased and the fifth degree of relationship, K is a deceased and the fifth degree of relationship, and K is the deceased's wife, and ③ The land of this case is confirmed as the deceased's possession of the land of this case, ④ The defendant confirmed as the owner of the land of this case as a result of the fact that the owner of the land of this case has not been discovered, and thus, the land of this case is owned by the same person as the deceased's heir's shares in the register.

arrow