logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.15 2017나14805
물품대금
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

The status of the parties to recognition is that the Plaintiff is engaged in the business of design, etc. of sculptures under the trade name of “C”.

The defendant company is a limited company for the purpose of designing, manufacturing and constructing fireworks, and its substantial representative is D.

On February 9, 2017, the non-Gun announced a tender on March 2, 2017 with respect to the E Project “E” (hereinafter “E-Military Project”), but the non-Gun announced the tender on March 2, 2017, but revoked the tender.

On March 17, 2017, the non-military government announced the bidding on the non-military project again by the deadline for bidding until March 29, 2017.

Around March 2017, Defendant Company entered into a design service agreement with the Plaintiff, through F, with the price of KRW 1,100,000 (including value-added tax) to participate in the bidding for non-military projects.

By March 28, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the design work in accordance with the above design service agreement by completing the design and sending it to the Defendant company after receiving eight design draft designs from the Defendant Company.

Defendant Company participated in the bidding of a non-military project by utilizing the design completed by the Plaintiff on March 29, 2017, but failed to receive the award.

With respect to the business of the fatheran-gun, the defendant company is the defendant company's business with the sports association of the fatheran-gun on April 20, 2017, and the "G installation work" (hereinafter referred to as the "G installation work").

A) As to the construction cost, 20,000,000 won, and the completion date of construction work was set as of April 30, 2017, and entered into a contract for construction works. Around April 2017, the Defendant Company entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on the supply of design printed materials and signboard materials necessary for the business of the Buan Military through F to KRW 10,087,110 (including value-added tax). The Defendant Company received design printed materials and signboard materials from the Plaintiff on two occasions (based on recognition) without dispute. [The grounds for recognition] There was no dispute, Party A’s 1,3,4 through 8, 11 through 17, and Party B’s evidence (including serial numbers, each entry and pleading.

arrow