1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against C and D, expressed as the representative of the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant asserts that the lawsuit of this case is unlawful, since the plaintiff did not have the substance as an organization, since it was filed by a person who is incapable of being a party.

On the other hand, if an organization is an unincorporated association and has the ability to be a party pursuant to Article 52 of the Civil Procedure Act, it shall establish rules with its own proper purpose to establish a decision-making body and its executive body and, based on these rules, have a representative who is an unincorporated association, and the method of decision-making or execution of business is carried out by the principle of majority majority, and the organization itself shall continue to exist, regardless of changes arising from the membership, withdrawal, etc. of its members, regardless of the method of representative, the operation of the general meeting or board of directors, the composition of capital, the management

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da60908, Jan. 30, 2009). However, the materials submitted by the Plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was equipped with an entity as a non-corporate group to the same extent, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

(3) The plaintiff's ground of appeal pointing this out is with merit. The plaintiff's ground of appeal pointing this out is with merit. The plaintiff's ground of appeal pointing this out.

2. As such, the instant lawsuit is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.