1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following payment order shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court stated this part of the underlying facts and the purport of the parties’ assertion are as stated in Articles 1 and 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Articles 1 and 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, from three to ten pages of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Occurrence of a claim for indirect construction costs;

A. Whether the Defendant’s obligation to adjust the contract amount is recognized [△△△] (1) In the event that grounds for the extension of the contract period arise without any cause attributable to the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract shall request the extension of the contract period to the contracting officer, and the contracting officer shall investigate and confirm the fact, and take necessary measures, such as extending the contract period so that the construction can be appropriately implemented. As such, where it is necessary to adjust the contract amount due to the change in the contract terms without any cause attributable to the other party to the contract, the contract shall be adjusted within the extent not exceeding the actual expenses, and where the construction is delayed due to a cause attributable to the other party to the contract, the compensation for delay shall be imposed on the other party to the contract. If the construction is delayed without delay due to a cause attributable to the other party to the contract, the relevant number of days shall not be included in the number of days at which the construction is subject to the compensation for delay, / [o] the part of the contract extended due to such cause attributable to the other party’s purchase of the land in this case.