1. The Defendant’s KRW 72,706,802 as well as 5% per annum from June 3, 2014 to August 12, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Defendant entered into a solicitation and cooperation contract for attracting C with the Han 63 Simti Co., Ltd., and ELS War.

The Plaintiff carried on manufacturing installation works, such as solar energy, independent power generation system, etc., with the trade name of “D”. The Plaintiff entered into a business contract and installation of solar power generation facilities with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant establishment and business contract”) and carried on the business of establishing and operating the 18th generation of solar energy (hereinafter “instant establishment and business contract”) and the 10th household in the Hanslish Home 1, the 18th household in the Hanslish Home 2, the 10th household in the Hanslish Home 3, the

The details of the construction costs and operating expenses for the first, second, and third parts of the Han River are as follows, and the sum of which is 112,530,000 won.

The defendant paid 2,200,000 won to the 18th household construction cost of Hancheon Home 1 = 39,600,000 won x 1,210,000 won x 18 = 21,780,000 won x 5 = 11,210,000 won x 5 = 5 = 2,210,000 won x 5 = 6,050,000 won x 2,200,000 won x 1,210,000 won x 1,210,000 won x 1,210,000 won x 1,210,000 won x 1,200 won x 10,000 won x 12,000 won x 10,000 won x 100,000 won x 319,2198.2

Applicant The settlement statement (A. 5, attached Form) prepared and delivered by the Defendant E by the Defendant’s fraud to the Plaintiff shall contain the same contents as the attached Form.

B. Around February 2012, the Plaintiff related to the Mandogian Society and the Jungdo Man Society established a contract with the Defendant for the cost of construction for solar power generation works at KRW 7,200,000 for the so-called So-called So-called Social Welfare Foundation and the So-called So-called Social Welfare Foundation. The said construction was completed thereafter.

The plaintiff shall receive and keep the construction cost of KRW 5,000,000 from the So-called So-called So-called "Surris Society" and the So-called "Surris Society". The defendant does not pay the remainder of the construction cost to the plaintiff.

C. On February 7, 2012, the Plaintiff lent KRW 2,500,00 to the Defendant’s agent F.