Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from April 27, 2013 to September 4, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
(a)be paid. Article 7 (Separate Remuneration);
(a) contingent remuneration - Where the delegated affairs, referring to the last special agreement at hand, have been successful through a judgment, judicial or judicial reconciliation (including a decision of recommending reconciliation), mediation (including a decision in lieu of mediation), etc., the gold (public) personnel shall be paid as contingent remuneration;
(b) Where it is deemed that he/she won: He/she shall report it to the winning in the following cases, and pay the amount of the contingent remuneration prescribed in the above paragraph (a):
1. Where the Plaintiff has invested a considerable effort to perform delegated affairs, and the Defendant voluntarily waives or recognizes a claim, withdraws a lawsuit, or withdraws an appeal (hereinafter “instant favorable provision”).
C. Of the grounds of subparagraph 1 of the preceding paragraph, when the defendant waivers a claim, withdraws a lawsuit, recognizes and withdraws an appeal without any economic benefits or other benefits, the plaintiff's efforts and results of the plaintiff's performance of duties may be considered, and the defendant may adjust the contingent remuneration upon mutual agreement.
* Matters of special agreement
2. 5% of the economic profit the defendant gains by means of judgment, conciliation, consultation, arbitration, etc. with contingent fees shall be paid, and the defendant shall pay the contingent fees by offering the divided real estate as security to financial institutions or by disposing of the divided real estate in cash.
(B) at the request of the defendant, the plaintiff entirely act on behalf of the plaintiff with the provision of security and disposal of real estate.
On May 10, 2012, when the divorce case of this case is pending, the Defendant submitted a written withdrawal of the lawsuit concerning the same case and concluded the case as the withdrawal of the lawsuit on May 30, 2012.
C. As of around 2011, the Defendant’s net property (the amount obtained by subtracting a passive property from positive property; hereinafter the same shall apply) is KRW 4,302,09,809, and KRW 12,037,920,948 in total as KRW 16,339,930,757 in total.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 8, and Eul evidence 7 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1
2. The plaintiff's assertion.