A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around January 30, 2018, the defendant of "2019 Highest 6051", the defendant around January 30, 2018, to E, the representative director of the D Co., Ltd., a victimized company, who installed a card device in the board 100 unit and borrowed the purchase cost of the card device in order to sell the damaged company's goods, he/she would repay until March 31, 2018, and the borrowed money would be used only for the purpose of purchasing the card device.

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the money up to the due date, even if he borrowed money from the victimized company due to the absence of a certain amount of income, because the Defendant did not use it for the purpose of purchasing the card terminal, but was thought to consume it by personal debt, installment payments, and payment of credit card bills.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the damaged company as above and then transferred 25 million won to G bank account (H) in the name of F that the defendant manages as the purchase price for the card terminal on the same day from the victimized company.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the damaged company.

around October 2017, the Defendant 2020 group 2775 of 2020 group 2775 (the Defendant) in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Geumdong, and the Defendant 1 may increase the amount of fine to the victim I, regardless of age, if he/she installs a self-reader with loans.

For the installation of a self-market, security deposit to be paid to VN companies is necessary.

The reason behind the ruling was that the self-reader program will be returned at that time.

However, there is no security deposit in the establishment of a factual self-reader, and the defendant is expected to use the money received from the damaged person as the purchase price for the defendant's self-reader and the personal business fund, so there is no intention or ability to install the self-reader even if he receives money from the damaged person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.