A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:10, the Defendant: (b) laid down the bricks, which are dangerous things in the vicinity of the report, where the victim E (the victim of 42 years of age) was dissatisfied with the president, etc. who was aware of the Defendant; (c) laid down the bricks, which are dangerous things around the report, and (d) caused the victim’s injury to the two open wife in need of medical treatment for 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of the F, E, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., grounds for considering the circumstances of the crime);

1. Suspension of execution: Recommendation, sentence scope (in the case of violence crimes, special injury, type 1, mitigation area (special mitigation area): Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and June - 2 years) and the following circumstances on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the grounds of sentencing), the sentence shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances. The favorable circumstances are against the recognition of crimes; the victim has agreed with the victim and the victim does not want to be punished; the victim does not want to have been punished; the victim has no record of criminal punishment for violence-related crimes other than the amount of a fine of 500,000 won due to damage to public goods in 2012: The fact that it cannot be deemed that the nature of the crime cannot be mitigated due to a crime at the price of the back head of the dangerous object: circumstances of the crime, the defendant's age, occupation, family relation, etc.;