1. With respect to water leakage accidents that occurred in the Young-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment D on December 30, 2018, the Plaintiff is against the Defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 30, 2018, around 10:00 on December 30, 2018, water pipes buried on the front floor of the c apartment of the Plaintiff’s apartment (the apartment) were damaged, thereby causing damage to the Defendant’s apartment, such as the main bank of the Heung-gu C apartment E and the cell ceiling.

(hereinafter “instant water accident”). (b)

G operating “F” around April 1, 2019, at the request of the Plaintiff, performed the design construction of the Defendant’s main room and the living room.

C. The Plaintiff paid KRW 1,430,000 to G for the Defendant’s main room and the funeral room construction cost.

On February 24, 2009, H paid to H the insurance money of KRW 2,010,000 due to the water leakage accident of this case (i.e., the cost of preventing damage - KRW 1,430,000 for the Defendant - self-payment of KRW 20,000) in accordance with the terms and conditions for the family life compensation liability that guarantees the above insurance contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry or video of Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each branch number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to terminate the instant water leakage incident with the Plaintiff’s implied agreement on the payment of the costs of the instant water leakage, and accordingly, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,430,00 for the costs of the instant water leakage incident. As such, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have any liability for damages related to the water leakage accident in excess of the above KRW 1,430,000.

B. The Defendant’s alleged construction cost does not exceed KRW 1,430,000, and further spreads damage, such as reconstruction of defective painting, replacement of a tent, lighting of a tent in a living room, change of the main floor of a kitchen, refluoring of a kitchen, refluoring of a kitchen, and the occurrence of myiation.

C. As to the water leakage accident of this case, the defendant's main room and the defendant's leader construction work was conducted in relation to the water leakage accident of this case, and the plaintiff's construction work cost 1.