beta
Cases
2016 2 33346 Revocation of the imposition of penalty surcharges
Plaintiff, Appellant
1. Channels Co., Ltd.;
2. Typ stypha;
3. Shipbuilding Broadcasting Co., Ltd.
4. Daily broadcasting of stock companies.
Defendant, Appellee
Broadcasting Commission
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu662 decided January 13, 2016
Text
all appeals shall be dismissed.
The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
Examining the judgment of the court of first instance and the grounds of appeal, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is in accordance with the procedure of final appeal.
Since it is obvious that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and that it is groundless, an appeal is filed under Article 5 of the said Act.
It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
May 24, 2016
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Lee In-bok
Justices Kim Yong-deok
Justices Kim So-young
Justices Lee Ki-taik