beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.
However, Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A On June 16, 2011, the Changwon District Court has been sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and has been sentenced to the same year.
9. 22. The same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and completed the execution of the sentence on May 10, 2012.
Defendant
B On July 19, 2013, the Gwangju District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) in the Mancheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 23, 2014.
1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) by the defendant A or B;
A. On March 17, 2014, Defendant A and G offered money and valuables under the pretext of agreement by reporting a marriage on March 17, 2014, and selecting victimized men to be subject to the crime, and by threatening the victim to detect the scene and file a complaint against the victim for a crime of adultery, Defendant A and B offered money and valuables under the pretext of agreement.
G entered into a sexual relationship with the victim H, who is a middle school teacher, at the 2nd amba-dong Ma-dong Mandong, Gwangju, on May 2014, and Defendant A made a threat to the victim by putting the victim’s flab, “to have pumped, to be reported as a crime of adultery,” and by threatening the victim. Defendant A and B made a threat to the charge of the charge of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the defendant A and B, “to have it contracted, to be reported as a crime
5. Although it is indicated as around 21.21. At the second trial, Defendant B claimed that the victim did not live and did not participate in intimidation. According to each of the evidence (Investigation Record 16-17 pages) duly adopted and investigated by this court, Defendant B made a statement to the effect that Defendant A had a specific talk, such as a demand for money, while Defendant B participated in the process of demanding sexual relation detection at the investigative agency, and Defendant B made a statement to the effect that the above correction based on the Defendant’s statement was a defense of Defendant B’s defense.