1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

A. Of the area of 846 square meters in Jannam-gun, the annexed map No. 6 to 9, 28, 29, and 6 are each indicated in the annexed map No. 846 square meters.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 9, 1963 under the Daejeon District Court Budget Office receipt No. 2525, as to the 846m2, J-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “instant J land”) and the 737m2, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “instant K land”). As of the date of closing argument of this case, the Defendant is registered as the owner of each of the above lands under the registration certificate even as of the date of closing argument of this case.

The network L from October 20, 1972, from around October 20, 1972, occupied and used the part of the J land (B) (hereinafter “instant land”) as farmland from around December 10, 1972, and from around December 10, 1972, the part of the instant K land (c) (hereinafter “instant land”) from around December 10, 1972 until around 202, respectively.

From 2002 to the date of the closing of argument in this case, Plaintiff H, a child of the deceased L, has occupied and used the land in this case (b) and (c) by directly occupying or leasing it to M.

The deceased L has died on June 30, 2002, and the heir has a child.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 5-1, 2-1, 11, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 12-2, witness M, N's testimony, the result of this court's request for measurement and appraisal on the budget branch of the Korea Land Information Corporation's budget branch of the land in this court, the whole purport of the pleadings [the defendant raised questions about the facts that the deceased L has occupied and used the land from 1972 to 1972, but the testimony of witnessO alone is insufficient to reverse the above fact-finding];

B. According to the above facts, from October 20, 1972, the deceased L continued to possess the land of this case from October 20, 1972 to December 10, 1972 as to the land of this case, and from December 10, 1972 to 202 as to the land of this case, each of the above possession is presumed to have been of peace and public performance as owned by the doctor.

Therefore, there are no special circumstances.