Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is whether the Defendant, around 02:40 on May 19, 2017, was the victim E ( South, 28 years old) who satisfyed the Defendant, who satisfyed the Defendant, when he was frightd in the street of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, about 19:5, when she was frightd to fright the head dump of female-friendly job offering D, frighted, led, towed, and fright
C. He saw a bath, “Fresh, fat,” and assaulted the victim’s chest on twice the victim’s chest by drinking breath and drinking.
2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the injured party in accordance with paragraph 3 of the same Article.
In this regard, according to the statement of non-permanent sources of punishment bound in the trial records, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on September 15, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.