logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.05.11 2013고정6334
대외무역법위반등
Text

Defendants are acquitted.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is the representative director of Company B located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is a corporation with the purpose of manufacturing and wholesaleing non-ferrous metal pipes and emuls at the above location. A.

Defendant

A1) No person violating the Foreign Trade Act may import goods, etc. produced in a foreign country from the country as if they were the Republic of Korea by means of obtaining a certificate of origin with false content. Defendant A imported the same-kel cocolumbs in a non-processed state from China, and manufactured the same-kel columbs, a finished product, through processing processes, such as artificial launch, confirmation, heat treatment, etc., in exporting them to the United States, Europe, and China region, the origin of the goods is not changed because the processing conducted in Korea alone is insufficient to give substantial transformation and give essential characteristics. Although the value added was increased considerably through artificial process, the import price of the imported goods was reduced by more than 85% of the total manufacturing cost, but the origin of the goods was not changed but the origin of the goods was not changed, and the goods were exported by a foreign buyer after submitting a certificate of origin declaration to the Korea Chamber, which was issued by the Korea Chamber, and the goods were exported by a foreign buyer.

As a result, Defendant A purchased the total of eight times from October 15, 2007 to January 8, 2008, in 2008, the head of the Republic of Korea-Nelgygyg export price of KRW 870,983,00,00 in China and filed an export declaration number with the two customs offices on January 17, 2008, and filed an export declaration number with F. In order to export it, Defendant A is originating in Korea.

arrow