The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim, the court below convicted the defendant, and the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 원심이 적법하게 조사한 증거들에 의해 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 추행 당시의 상황에 대하여 구체적이고 일관되게 진술한 점, ② 피해자는 피고인으로부터 추행을 당한 직후 지인들이 있는 G 단체 채팅방에 ‘차장이가 내 엉덩이 때렸다’라는 메시지를 전송하였고, 또다시 ‘M’라는 사용자에게 ‘차장님이 그리고 나 엉덩이 쳤어!!!!‘라는 메시지를 전송하였는바, 이는 피해자가 피고인으로부터 추행을 당한 직후 지인들에게 전송한 것으로서 허위 개입의 여지가 적은 점 등을 종합해 보면, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자를 추행한 사실이 충분히 인정된다.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the background leading up to the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, the degree of indecent act, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Article 59-3 of the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act, which was amended by Act No. 15904 on December 11, 2018 and enforced on June 12, 2019, ex officio determination on an order for employment restriction under the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act, is subject to punishment or medical treatment and custody by sex offense.