The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was a person who retired in the third year of high school, and the victim B (Nam, 17 years of age) is a high school student, who is a middle school line and a post-school relationship.

At around 18:00 on July 6, 2018, the Defendant sent the victim a game in the PC located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, with the five-story stairs, and used the victim “I am am am I am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am.” However, the Defendant heard the answer from the victim that “I am am am am am am. I am am am am am am......... I am am am in order to verify the am am am am ams ams am..... However, the victim requested the victim to confirm the am am am ams am in order to confirm the am am am ams am........” am am am am am am.

2. The determination may not be charged against the intent expressed by the victim in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the court below's decision on the non-prosecution of punishment prepared by the deputyF of the legal representative of the victim, the victim can be acknowledged on March 8, 2019, which was the date the prosecution of this case was initiated, as the defendant had withdrawn his wish to punish.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.