logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.05.31 2018고단268
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2018, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 23:50, the Defendant expressed a bath to the said taxi engineer “to open” in front of the F District in E in the East Sea while driving the taxi in D taxi.

On March 28, 2018, at around 00:08, the Defendant was urged to return to the police officer, such as G, etc., who was in the front line, to return to the police officer first, by entering the front line for about 10 minutes.

Accordingly, the above police officers “welves, ploss, and ploss.”

Some homicides must be reflected.

C. The expression "C." was expressed as "S., and the background of the G was assaulted by walking three times in the direction of the G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on comprehensive consideration of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., and the details of the instant crime, as set forth in the order.

Unfavorable circumstances: The obstruction of the execution of official duties is not only detrimental to the function of the state's legal order by nullifying legitimate exercise of public authority, but also is also related to the excessive restriction of the safety of the general public. Therefore, the circumstances favorable to the criminal requiring strict punishment corresponding thereto: the defendant's mistake and reflects his mistake, and only the records of punishment once as a fine in 195.

arrow