All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

The punishment sentenced by the court below by the public prosecutor is too uneasible.

Judgment

The defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case.

The instant telephone financial fraud (one-time phishing) crime was attempted.

There is no power to commit the same crime and only one time before the fine is imposed.

On the other hand, the crime of Bophishing in this case requires strict punishment of severe social harm, and is a good crime due to planned and organized crimes.

The role of the defendant's fee and remittance is that the degree of participation is not easy as an essential role in the criminal act of Bosing.

In addition, considering all of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable.

The defendant and prosecutor's assertion are without merit.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.