The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court rejected the applicant C’s application for compensation (the period 198 early 2018, Gwangju District Court 2018).

Therefore, pursuant to Article 32 (4) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, an applicant for compensation cannot file an objection against the judgment dismissing an application for compensation. Thus, the case for which an application for compensation is filed is immediately determined and the rejection of the above application for compensation is excluded from the scope of adjudication of this

2. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

3. We examine the judgment, the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected it, and that the defendant's wife D deposited one million won in the court below against the victim of the crime of injury.

However, the fact that the defendant committed violent crimes against wife and wife due to dangerous things, etc. is poor, and the victims are receiving severe punishment.

In addition, considering the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.