Defendant 1, 2016 order 825 order 1 to 4, 2016 order 1061, 2016 order 1660 order order 1660 each.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On October 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to a suspended sentence of six months for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 On February 2015, the Defendant posted a false statement that he/she sold clothes, shoess, and bags, etc. on the Internet site at the Internet site, at a non-permanent site, and reported that he/she would send two clothes when he/she first deposits to the victim C.

However, the defendant did not possess the above article, and there was no intention or ability to send it to the victim by purchasing it.

Around February 28, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50,000 won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account (D) account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the victim, and received 1,161,600 won in total from the six victims from the above day to December 28, 2015, respectively, as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Offenses 1, as well as from the above day to December 28, 2015.

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 1061,” made a false statement to the effect that, in the event that the Defendant sent the Kakao Stockholm message to the victim E, he would immediately pay the price.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even after receiving the things from the damaged person.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the amount of money worth KRW 350,000 on the following day from the victim, by delivering it as a door-to-door.

On September 2014, 2014, the Defendant posted a letter stating that he sells clothes to the cell phone Kakao scaro scaro at a place that was not a police officer, and made a false statement that he would send the text to the victim F who was contacted with the Kakao scaro scaro scaro scaro.

However, the defendant did not have any goods sold, and purchased them to the victim.