The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2015, the Defendant driven a CKanche vehicle at around 09:10, and driven a two-lane road in front of the D of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, along the offside of the Hocheon-dong, along the two-lane road from the offside of the Hocheon-dong.

At the same time, the signal lights and stop lines and crosswalks are installed and the red signal was on-and-off, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by making a temporary stop immediately before entering the intersection, and by taking care of other traffic, the driver was obliged to take care of the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to temporarily stop in red on-and-off signals and proceeded to crosssections without temporarily suspending them, and left straight from the left side of the Defendant’s proceeding to the right side by using yellow on-and-off signals, and proceeded with the above shooting distance from the offside of Yacheon-dong to the hack-dong side.

E had first received the right side of G taxi driving by the victim FF (55 years, South) of the victim F(55 years, South) in front of the Defendant’s car.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered brain-dead sugar, etc. to the victim in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, and the victim H (22 tax, female) on board the above car for a day, respectively, due to the need for treatment between the victim and the victim H (22).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a survey report on actual condition;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs and CD-accident video (the Defendant could not have predicted that the damaged vehicle was covered by the shock caused by the shock of the primary accident, and it could not be possible to immediately stop the vehicle and prevent the traffic accident if the primary accident did not occur, and thus, there was no relation between the breach of the duty of care and the occurrence of the accident. However, in full view of the foregoing evidence, the point where the Defendant shocked the damaged vehicle is within the intersection.