1. The Defendant’s KRW 80,206,361 as well as 6% per annum from November 8, 2018 to May 1, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in attached Form of claims;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the “Plaintiff”, and the “debtor” shall be deemed to be the “Defendant”). 2. Service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. In cases of an obligation with no fixed time limit for partial dismissal, the obligor shall be liable for delay only from the time following the day on which he/she receives a request for performance to cause delay.

That is, the due date for the obligation to pay the instant goods has arrived on June 23, 2017.

There is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the performance of the unpaid goods prior to the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for delay exceeding the above recognition scope is rejected.