Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On June 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 00:30 on June 25, 2017, and proceeded at a speed that is impossible to identify the first road on the front side of Pyeongtaek-si E at a two-round speed.

At the time, night and at this time, they were narrow roads of one lane. In such cases, there was a duty of care to pay attention to those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle not exceeding the central line, and to prevent accidents such as proper operation of steering devices and brakes in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant got the front portion of the Defendant’s driver’s car, which was driven by the driver’s negligence while driving a stroke, in front of the victim F(46) driving which was driven by the driver’s vehicle in the opposite part.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above victim F by negligence in the above occupational negligence an injury such as a chloud stroke, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim H (37 years of age) of the victim of the damaged vehicle, such as cloud fe, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. A fact-finding survey report, a traffic accident occurrence report, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s negligence is relatively serious in the central intrusion of the reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the victim’s injury is serious; the victim’s injury is recognized to commit a crime and is seriously contradictory to the fact that there is no other criminal records other than the fine once in 2005; and the above F and F agree.