logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.01.23 2018나14265
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (Plaintiff).

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is that the court of first instance additionally submitted evidence to be written and rejected N’s testimony which is insufficient to reverse the fact of recognition of the judgment of the court of first instance. Except for the following addition, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by the main sentence

A letter of the first instance judgment shall add "N" to the representative of the defendant in front of 4th 7th N.

The following shall be added to the fifth and sixth written judgment of the court of first instance.

Even according to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant’s place of service, where the Plaintiff was aware of the case subject to review, is the address of the office where the Defendant had assisted the Defendant’s legal affairs. The Civil Procedure Act sets “the domicile, residence, office of the person to be served” or “the address, etc. of another person employed by the person to be served by employment delegation or other legal acts” as the place of service (Article 183(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act). Thus, it is difficult to view it as a legitimate place of service to the other party to the lawsuit as stipulated in the Civil Procedure Act, regardless of the fact that the Defendant

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow