A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the defendant shall be sentenced to the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Criminal power is a person who received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 from the Daejeon District Court on April 10, 2006 to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, from the same support on August 8, 2007 to a fine of KRW 2,50,000 as the same crime, and from the same support on November 16, 2012 to a fine of KRW 3,00,000 as the same crime in the same court public order support on November 16, 2012.

Criminal facts

On February 27, 2014, at around 22:05, the Defendant driven a Bsp motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.184% from the section of approximately 1 km in the 1km of the 1km of the Maok-dong of the same city-spynam-si to the front road of the same city-spynam-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Statement of control of D;

1. 교통사고발생보고서, 교통사고보고⑴⑵(실황조사서), 사고현장사진, 주취운전자적발보고서, 주취운전자정황진술보고서

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., circumstances favorable to the accused among the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering Circumstances favorable to the accused among the following reasons for sentencing):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Articles 59 and 62 of the Act on Probation, etc., even though the Defendant had been sentenced to criminal punishment for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on three occasions in the past, the Defendant committed the instant crime in the state of exploitation of blood alcohol concentration of 0.184%, so it is inevitable to choose a sentence in choosing a sentence.

In determining specific punishment, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the past suspension of execution, and the crime of this case.