The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On September 4, 2017, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case: (a) around 11:40, the Defendant driven a B EX-type car and led the Defendant to run a private-distance intersection (hereinafter “instant intersection”) located in the 112-distance B Roon-gun, Gwancheon-gun, Gwangjin-gun, Mawon-gun, Mawon-won, to a restaurant at the seat of the management office of the public corporation. Since the private-distance intersection was a private-distance intersection where there is no signal, and traffic control is not performed, the Defendant viewed the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the instant EX-type car safely by temporarily stopping prior to entering the intersection, without neglecting the duty of care, caused the victim’s death to the right side of the said intersection, and caused the victim’s death to run the said intersection at the right side of the instant 90-2.0

2. 원심의 판단 원심은, 피고인이 이 사건 교차로 진입 직전에 일시정지하는 등 도로 교통법 제 31조 제 2 항 제 1호에서 정한 통행방법을 준수하지 않은 이상, 피고 인의 차량이 피해자의 오토바이보다 이 사건 교차로에 먼저 진입하였다거나 피고인 차량의 속도보다 피해자 오토바이의 속도가 더 빨랐다는 사정만으로는 피고인에게 주의의무 위반이 없었다고

On the ground that it is difficult to conclude this case’s facts charged, the lower court convicted.

3. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실 오인 내지 법리 오해 피고인의 차량이 피해자의 오토바이보다 교차로에 먼저 진입하였을 뿐만 아니라 피해자의 오토바이 속도가 피고인의 차량 속도 보다 빨랐던 것으로 보이는 점 등에 비추어 보면, 설령...