1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:30 on June 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested amnesty on the fact that the Defendant intended not to lend money to his wife C before the victim B (Nam, 52 years of age) prior to his age, and attached her head to the Defendant’s scam to the Defendant’s scam, “on the scam to the Defendant’s scam.” In that case, the Defendant scamed the victim’s face and scam to the Defendant’s scam to the Defendant’s scam, and scam to the victim’s face and scam to the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of general injury and basic area of the recommended punishment based on the sentencing guidelines (if a victim is reasonably responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage," the factors to be mitigated shall be offset): April to June: imprisonment with labor for up to one year;

2. Whether or not to be punished for a suspended sentence, and the serious reflectivity: Selection of a suspended sentence;

3. Four months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution; and