Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 16, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon Friwon method.

[Criminal facts] On July 11, 2020, the Defendant driven a Ftoscar car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.056% in a section of about 1k from the front side of the apartment house C to the front side of the E-mail located in D, Ansan-si around 01:51, the Defendant driven a Ftoscar car with approximately 0.056% alcohol level.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at home, a report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and an investigation report (a report on the situations of the driver at home);

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (the previous conviction in the same case and confirmation);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and all sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered.

Unfavorable circumstances: Re-driving under the influence of alcohol despite the history of punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol, and the favorable circumstances that the risk of the driving was not low in light of the circumstance of detection: The fact that the crime is recognized and reflects, the alcohol concentration level in the blood was relatively high at the time of detection, and the recidivism after a considerable period of time has elapsed from the time of the previous previous conviction.