The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the overall sentencing conditions of the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is divided into and against the wrongness of the defendant, and the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is limited to the small amount, and the defendant's health status is not good, and there is little difficulty in the convict life.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime, however, theft of property by entering another person’s vehicle during the fourth time, and the Defendant was punished several times due to special robbery, etc., not only has the same history of punishment, but also has a high potential to criticize the instant crime without the same reflectivity even during the period of suspension of execution. The lower court appears to have determined the sentence by fully considering the fact that the sentence imposed on the Defendant is invalidated when the sentence is imposed on the Defendant. In full view of all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.