On December 19, 2018, the Seoul Western District Court against the plaintiff was based on the payment order of the defendant 2018 tea 80121.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the defendant filed an application against the plaintiff for a payment order of credit card use price with Seoul Western District Court 2018 tea80121, which was the same court on December 19, 2018, for the plaintiff's payment order of KRW 16% per annum from December 13, 2018 to the day of full payment, for KRW 2,800,00 per annum 24% per annum from December 13, 2018 to the day of full payment, and for KRW 254,90,00 per annum from December 13, 2018 to the day of full payment, the defendant may recognize the payment order of KRW 18.9% per annum from December 13, 2018 to the day of full payment, and for KRW 254,90,00 per annum 36,00 per annum 15,209.

According to the above facts, since claims based on the payment order of this case were extinguished by the plaintiff's above payment deposit, compulsory execution based on the payment order of this case shall be dismissed.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.