logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.06.23 2017가단3546
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a)Annexed drawings (a), (b), (c), (d)(i) and (i) of the second floor of the real estate listed in the annex list;

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On May 6, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant with regard to the lease deposit amount of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 500,500,000 (payment on May 6, 201), and the lease term of KRW 500,000 (payment on May 6, 201), with respect to the lease deposit amount of KRW 207,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

Although the instant lease contract has been renewed continuously, the Defendant, on December 23, 2016, prepared a written statement of performance that “The Defendant would pay to the Plaintiff by February 4, 2017, that it is a smuggling,” to the Plaintiff on December 23, 2016.

C. However, the Defendant did not implement the said promise, and the sum of the rent in arrears up to February 2017 reaches KRW 16.9 million.

The Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract as the instant complaint. The Defendant transferred the instant real estate, and sought payment of the unpaid rent of KRW 16.9 million and damages for delay from the next day after the delivery of a copy of the instant complaint. The Plaintiff sought payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 500,000 per month from April 6, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

2. Judgment deeming the confession as the basis (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow