Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged in this case
A. On October 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, at the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Apartment Underground Parking Lot, the Defendant used a taxi operated by the Defendant, and (b) transferred a taxi fee to the bank account known by the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant’s mobile phone was not known as the Defendant’s mobile phone; (d) without checking the details of the deposit in the said account, the Defendant immediately left the victim’s arms and necks by her hand; (e) took down the victim’s arms and necks; and (e) took down the back head of the victim’s cell by her hand on several occasions; and (e) took the back head of the victim’s cell.
B. The Defendant is insulting.
At the time, place, and the victim was led to the defendant's taxi, and the above apartment residents were heard by the above apartment residents, and the victim was openly insultingd.
2. Determination
(a) Determination of the applicable provisions of law concerning violence: Article 260(1)2 of the Criminal Act: Article 260(3)3 of the Criminal Act provides that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant after the prosecution of this case; Article 260(3)4 of the Criminal Act provides that the judgment dismissing prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act
B. Determination on insult: Article 311(2) of the Criminal Act: An offense subject to prosecution subject to prosecution subject to prosecution subject to prosecution subject to prosecution: Article 312(1)3 of the Criminal Act; and Article 312(3) of the Criminal Act indicates the victim’s intention to revoke his/her complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of the instant case; 4) Public prosecution