logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.08.12 2015가단22174
중개수수료
Text

1. Defendant B’s 47,700,000 won and the interest rate of 15% per annum from July 21, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 11, 2013, Defendant Peduc Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Peduc”) concluded a sales agency agreement with the Defendant Defendant Peduc Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Peduc”) on a 21% of sales commission as the owner and interest holder of the building C in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and entered into a sales agency agreement with Nonparty D on a sales commission for the sales agency with Nonparty D. 15% of sales commission.

B. Defendant B entered into a contract with D with 9% of the sales commission for the sales agency business, and operated 1 team, 2 team, and 3 team in the position of the chief of the headquarters, and entered into a contract with the team leader and employees (1 to 4) in each team.

(Foreign E shall serve as the team leader of two teams from July 14, 2014 to August 8, 2014).

The team leader and employees of the defendant B and each team agreed that the head of the above 9% of the sales commission shall be 1% in case of the defendant B, the team leader shall be 2% in case of the employees of the team, and the employees shall distribute the remaining 6% in case of the introduction of the real estate broker other than the above team. The agreement was reached to allocate 3% in case of the introduction of the real estate broker other than the above team, and 3% in case of the employee.

E, according to the above agreement and agreement, around July 2014, the Plaintiff, a licensed real estate agent, remains unsold in lots. In response to the applicant for sale, E agreed to pay 3% of the sales price when the sales contract was concluded. On August 8, 2014, after E reached its maturity, Defendant B dealt with the following business affairs concerning the sales contract of this case, including the relationship with the Plaintiff.

E. On August 8, 2014, the Plaintiff’s introduction, thereby entering into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) on KRW 1,589,99,000 for the sales price for Nonparty F and the said C building 139 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) (excluding value-added tax, KRW 335,846,00 for the payment at the time of the contract, and the remainder payment date).

arrow