The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) by the lower court is too uneasible.

2. The appellate court’s judgment is reasonable to respect the sentencing condition in comparison with the first instance court where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the sentencing of the first instance court is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

The sentencing of the lower court appears to have determined the sentence in full consideration of the various favorable circumstances to the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to change the sentencing after the lower judgment.

In addition, examining the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, and the record of the crime in this case, it is not deemed that the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, the court below's second page 19 "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving)" is a clerical error in the "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018)", and therefore, it is evident that it is a clerical error in the "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) (the point of a sound driving) of the former